January 29, 2025
4 I will read the smallest
What Trump is talking about science in the new administration
Trump seems to intend to freeze experts, especially scientists who have a strong academic research. Instead, he supplies the leadership of engineers, roylists and federal government agencies.

US President Donald Trump will hold an order to announce the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Agreement. He was just signed on January 20, 2025 during the first parade in the Capital One Arena of Washington DC.
Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images
It is the ominous forecast of science that President Donald Trump’s recent triggers to break the enthusiastic norms of Donald Trump. A few days have passed since Trump returned to an elliptical office, but his presidential order and nomination were the surprising science and technology engines that the second Trump administration has driven the US economy for more than four quarters. We provide early clues about whether you can crush it like.
In the trajectory of the campaign, Trump promised to reduce federal expenditures. Firefighting experts regard it as “fraud” and take a sledge hammer for policies based on his whimsical facts. His Capitol Hill, including Mike Johnson, the House of Representatives, and Eron Mask, a supporter of his Mega Financial Campaign, the head of the newly created advisory group known as Douji (government efficiency).・ With the support of the allies, he has begun to convey his pledge.
Trump candidates for many high -level management posts have provided enough testimony to his light DA about science. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who tapped to lead the Ministry of Health and Welfare, is probably the most obvious case. He is a lawyer in training, a religious peddler, and a reputable conspiracy theorist, and he has authority on the direction of the National Institute of Health, which is a budget of about $ 500 billion per year. You will have it.
About the support of science journalism
If you are enjoying this article, consider supporting journalism that has won. Subscription. By purchasing a subscription, it will help you secure the future of a story that has an impactful story that forms our world today.
But he is not the only one. Crislight, a fracking executive and playing card for energy secretary, is not a denial of climate change, but he has a more hot planet that causes more frequent weather phenomena. I am skeptical. He has acknowledged the effects of carbon emissions against global warming, but continues to promote the production and use of fossil fuels. In order to scientifically adjust these two perspectives, you need to twist yourself to Pretzel. Of course, he reflects the central existence of Trump’s energy policy: “Drill, Baby, Drill.”
These two appointments only help Trump’s rejection of science itself. He claims that climate change is a hoax. He opposes the windmill and is called a whale murderer without scientific evidence. He has accused the recent Los Angeles mountain fire, closing the valve of the non -existent water pipeline. And in his first term, he promoted dangerous Quack drugs to fight COVID. He says he wants clean air and clean water, but contrary to good science, he is promoting the return to coal to produce electricity, and cautious about Sacramento San Joquin Delta. We are hijacking the water management practices of California that controls.
The only way to start knowing the scope of Trump’s science war is to look at two executive actions with international influence. On the first day of his new administration, he announced the withdrawal of the United States from both the Paris climate agreement and the World Health Organization. International science does not have a seat on Trump’s “American First” table.
These are not the only indicators that indicate where science may be in the next few years under Trump. While the President after World War II has high value in scientific expertise, Trump intends to freeze scientists, especially scientists with strong academic research. It seems. Instead, he supplies leadership between engineers and federal government agencies. Certainly, some people have praise and strong gratitude for science. However, in most cases, their qualifications talk about transaction policy planning and the agreement of Silicon Valley culture to break things before correction.
High -tech fellow culture, which captures Trump’s imagination, has little appetite for patience. This is the essential and necessary aspects of basic research that ultimately promote American science and technology engines. Other members of PayPal Mafia, who have advised Trump, may bring the current impressive economic interests here, but such advantages are Sputtering Science and Technology Engine in the future. It will surely come at the expense of sacrifice.
Trump’s future appointment and some of its qualifications indicate where he emphasizes.
David Sachs, which leads the advisory council on science and technology well -known in the initials, is a lawyer, a venture capitalist, and coached as the “emperor” of the administration. Masu.
Michael Kraszos, who leads an office of the White House Science and Technology Policy and serves as a president of the President, has a favorable review from the science community when he served as the highest technical representative and a provisional director of OSTP in Trump’s first term. I received it. But his educational background in his politics and Greek research is certainly unusual. He has been a management director of the AI ​​company for the past three years and has been a technician camp.
Emile Michael is the director of the Defense Bureau of Research and Engineering. Former Uber executive. He is a legal -educated businessman and is not a skilled engineering commonly found in technical pentagonal roles.
Dario Gil, who tapped Trump as the secretary -general of energy and innovation, is probably an exception, chairman of the National Science Committee, and works as an IBM research director. His professional profile tells his abilities, but depending on training and experience, he is a technician rather than a scientist.
Leadership and policies are important, but the quality of the federal science and federal science budget is also important. During the first week of his inauguration, Trump has established the employment freezing of the whole government, taking measures to replace the federal workers with Trump’s loyalty, and from an obvious political interference that requires science. Threats the continuity and freedom of. The funding side is involved in the support of science during the Republican planning of reducing taxes and increasing defense expenditures while restricting the scale of federal debt. That is the future. the current? All federal subsidies have just been stopped until the assigned person does not violate Trump’s unilateral execution order. (Suspension of the subsidy was temporarily suspended by the federal judge.)
Without a greater general perception, the ominous prediction will be inevitable.
This is an article on opinions and analysis, and the views that the author have expressed is not always a view. Scientific American.